RE: Complete LRM posted

["Yaron Kashai" <yaron@cadence.com>]

Hi Mark,

There is no such list, and in fact I hope there are no such
differences. At best, the standard may remain silent about
some aspects that are implemented currently, leaving the 
freedom for future implementation to either follow or diverge
from the current implementation. I would prefer not to rule
out behavior that's currently implemented. 

I propose that you pick up the specific issue with Vit Lagoon,
who is the author of that particular part. I suspect Vit has
good reasons for casting that restriction - some prior knowledge
of the generators to come... 

Vit is copied on this e-mail.

Cheers,
-- yaron
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: mastrick@cisco.com 
>Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 1:13 PM
>To: Yaron Kashai; 1647-l@ieee1647.org
>Subject: RE: Complete LRM posted
>
>Yaron,
>
>Is there any list that highlights the elements of this LRM that would
>"break" existing e code that is written for Specman?  As an example,
>7.2.7.4.5 says that "keep list1 in list2" cannot put list2 
>elements in a
>different order within list1.  While existing code would still parse, a
>generator that follows this LRM would not fill the coverage space as
>thoroughly as the Specman generator currently does (which does allow
>list element reordering).
>
>Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-1647-l@verificationvault.com
>[mailto:owner-1647-l@verificationvault.com] On Behalf Of Yaron Kashai
>Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 9:35 PM
>To: 1647-l@ieee1647.org
>Subject: Complete LRM posted
>
>
>Dear all,
>
>As requested in today's meeting, the complete LRM is now posted as one
>PDF file, to ease the review of the complete flow of the 
>document. (This
>version still lacks the preliminary clauses, such as overview).
>
>A direct link to the file:
>http://www.ieee1647.org/downloads/D0.3-PDF-files/ieee_P1647_d3.pdf
>
>The file is accessible from the Revision 0.3 download page at
>http://www.ieee1647.org/download_03.html along with the per-clause PDF
>files.
>
>Please take the time to review the latest version, we only have a few
>weeks to complete the work.
>
>Cheers,
>-- yaron
>
>