|
|
Meeting 21 minutes
Meeting 22 Minutes
Teleconference, June 5th, 2006
A quorum of 14 out of 17 voting
members present. Attendance indicated on the roster web page.
1. Call to order
Meeting was called to order at 09:00 PST/17:00 GMT.
2. Approval of minutes from meeting 21
Victor Berman moves to approve the minutes as posted.
Andy Piziali seconds.
No objections/abstainers. The motion to approve the minutes was
carried.
3. Discussion about the new PAR
The draft PAR for maintenance and extension of the e standard was
posted on 5/17/06. An e-mail comment period started Monday 5/22 and
ended Friday 6/2. One comment was received, about the inconsistent
naming of the standard. The proposal is to use "(the) functional
verification language e" in the title and "the e language" where the
context is clear.
Andy: There is another E language, where the capital E is used.
Traditionally we used times-roman bold italics for the e language.
Yaron: There is no copyright or trademark on 'e', hence any number of
languages can be called so. The PAR document is a plain text form, so
we can't make the style match.
Joe Daniels: It would be appropriate to note that the 'e' should be
styled accordingly in print, this could be added to the PAR.
Victor: Note that the number for the PSL project is wrong (1825 instead
of 1850). Also, is the intention to have a joint project with CAG, as
mentioned in section 7.1?
Yaron: will fix the PSL project number. The designation in section 7.1
is about standrds with similar scope, System Verilog in this case.
Joe Daniels: Need to make sure that the PAR title and the standard
title match.
The following changes were agreed to:
- use "Standard for the Functional Verification Language e" as the title
- use "the e language" anywhere else in the PAR
- add a comment to the title (section 2.1) under section 7.4
(Additional Explanatory Notes): When the e language is mentioned in
print the 'e' character should be formatted in Times-Roman Bold
Italics, to make it distinctive.
- fix the project number for PSL (1850).
4. Vote for the approval of the
new PAR
Considering
the draft PAR as posted and the agreed upon changes, a vote is called
to approve the PAR.
The vote will be by name, and a 2/3 majority is required, per WG bylaws.
The following results were recorded:
Voting
Member
|
Vote
|
Comment
|
| Victor Berman |
Approve
|
|
| Avi
Bloch |
Approve |
|
Serrie-Justine
Chapman
|
Approve |
|
Sandeep Desai
|
Approve |
|
| Stylianos
Diamantidis |
Approve |
|
| Darren Galpin |
Approve |
(e-mail vote)
|
Joseph
Hupcey
|
Approve |
|
Sylvie Hurat
|
Approve |
|
| Yaron Kashai |
Approve |
|
Eran
Keydar
|
Approve |
|
| Michael
McNamara |
Approve |
|
Steve
Pearlmutter
|
|
Not present
|
| Andrew
Piziali |
Approve |
|
David Van
Campenhout
|
Approve |
|
| Matan Vax |
Approve |
|
| David Von Bank |
Approve |
(e-mail vote)
|
| Henry Von Bank |
Approve |
|
The vote passed with 94% return and 100% approval.
The PAR as amended is approved for NesCom submission.
5. Other business
Yaron mentioned the discussion with Fraser Worley about errors in the
posted BNF. Andy proposed to forward his version of the BNF.
Joe asked about the WG schedule moving forward. Discussion tabled for
next meeting.
6. Patent policy
The chair has issued a call for essential patents, in compliance with
current IEEE/SA PatCom guidelines. The WG members are advised to review
the call for essential patents and the patent related slide
presentation posted on the web site.
7. Next meeting
Please remember to send in your e-mail to rollcall@ieee1647.org so that
your attendance on this call is registered.
• Please DON'T send these e-mails to the reflector
• Use the e-mail address you registered with
The next meeting is tentatively set to Monday July 10th at 09:00 AM
Pacific time, 17:00 UTC. The date may change according to circumstances.
7. Adjourn
|